🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.